It Turns Out that Learning About Computing is NOT like Learning to Drive a Car

Approximate Reading Time: 2 minutes

Why all our kids should be taught how to code: m.guardian.co.uk.

I’m just sayin’ ……

almost everything we have done over the last two decades in the area of ICT education in British schools has been misguided and largely futile. Instead of educating children about the most revolutionary technology of their young lifetimes, we have focused on training them to use obsolescent software products.

This is true in Canada too. Once again, Teacher Ed programs have gotten it wrong. Unfortunately, most Educational Technologists can’t help… they don’t know any more either. True, they may be encouraging their pre-service teachers to mess around with the “latest and greatest”, but unless they actually know something about how those apps work, they aren’t doing any more than training drivers.

We made the mistake of thinking that learning about computing is like learning to drive a car, and since a knowledge of internal combustion technology is not essential for becoming a proficient driver, it followed that an understanding of how computers work was not important for our children.

….

There will be lots of interesting discussions about the key concepts that students will need to understand, but here’s one possible list for starters. Kids need to know about: algorithms (the mathematical recipes that make up programs); cryptography (how confidential information is protected on the net); machine intelligence (how services such as YouTube, NetFlix, Google and Amazon predict your preferences); computational biology (how the genetic code works); search (how we find needles in a billion haystacks); recursion (a method where the solution to a problem depends on solutions to smaller instances of the same problem); and heuristics (experience-based techniques for problem-solving, learning, and discovery).

I ESPECIALLY like this last paragraph:

The biggest justification for change is not economic but moral. It is that if we don’t act now we will be short-changing our children. They live in a world that is shaped by physics, chemistry, biology and history, and so we – rightly – want them to understand these things. But their world will be also shaped and configured by networked computing and if they don’t have a deeper understanding of this stuff then they will effectively be intellectually crippled. They will grow up as passive consumers of closed devices and services, leading lives that are increasingly circumscribed by technologies created by elites working for huge corporations such as Google, Facebook and the like. We will, in effect, be breeding generations of hamsters for the glittering wheels of cages built by Mark Zuckerberg and his kind.

Be the first to like.

Computer Literacy: Does knowing how to drive = understanding cars?

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

Of course not.

So why do people believe that they “know” about computers simply because they can use Word, or iTunes, or some other app? (Or even a lot of apps…)

It is high time that we accept the fact that “technology” is here to stay and that we have become as reliant on computers as we are on electricity.

Does that mean everyone needs to know what I know about computing (I have 2 degrees in CS and taught it for 25+ years)? Hardly.

Does it mean everyone should know something about how this stuff actually works? You bet it does!

Here’s a great reason: You need to learn enough so that you are no longer at the mercy of IT people who try and tell you what is and is not possible or reasonable.

A Surge in Learning the Language of the Internet – NYTimes.com.

“We know that we’re not going to turn the 99 percent of people interested in learning to code into the 1 percent who are really good at it,” said Mr. Sims of Codecademy. “There’s a big difference between being code-literate and being a good programmer.”

You are fooling yourself if you think knowing how to use other people’s apps makes you literate. It’s like believing you know about cars simply because you can drive.

1 person likes this post.

I’m not the only one who has issues with the iPad 3

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

List of iPad gripes goes on and on – latimes.com.

  1. No Siri (not that I care to talk to my iPad in the first place)
  2. Weighs more.
  3. Gets physically hot.
  4. VERY fragile screen (DON’T EVER drop it).
  5. Takes a long time to charge.
  6. 4G will drain your data in no time.
  7. Wiggy WiFi

iPadI don’t understand why people are so in love with this device. Apple has a certain hubris that will ultimately bite it in the ass. I never thought I would say this, but MicroSoft is looking better all the time (yikes).

If you’re interested, check out my other iPad rants here and here.

Be the first to like.

What if we had FB’s privacy settings in real life?

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

I don’t think most people would like it very much.

Facebook amending statement of rights and responsbilities, here’s a rundown of the changes | VentureBeat.

 

an application your friend has downloaded also has the right to your information because you’ve allowed that friend to see your content

“We reserve the right to exclude or limit the provision of any service or feature in our sole discretion.”

Curious that FB thinks my friends’ apps should have access to all my stuff.

Big DogThat’s a little like saying my friends’ friends should all be welcome at my house…….

Or that I had to share all the same hobbies and pass-times that my friends do.

Hmmmmm……

Glad I have BIG dogs.

 

Wonder if there’d be a market for a Gaurd-Dog app – one that would keep other apps off your property.

3 people like this post.

Game-Education.Com – Home

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

A new place to check out if you’re looking for information on game education.

Game-Education.Com – Home.

1 person likes this post.

iPad3 means no shuffling between several gadgets … REALLY????

Approximate Reading Time: 3 minutes

iPad3 means no shuffling between several gadgets | NextWorth.

Professing never-ending love for the iPad has taken on a real cult-like fervor. It’s really quite embarrassing.

The digital world is converging on a revolutionary all-in-one device, the powerful, brand-new iPad. These are the iconic portable devices that led to (and are to some extent being replaced by) Apple’s innovation.

Get REAL.

I have an iPad – it has replaced NOTHING. In fact I now have MORE devices to carry around rather than fewer.

I just came back from an Ed Conference where almost everyone has an iPad. People in Education LOVE LOVE LOVE their iPads, and are quite hurt and offended if anyone says anything bad about them. When I say that it really isn’t much good at doing real work, they say, of COURSE it is…. I use mine ALL THE TIME.

OK. The infographic shows how people use their iPads.

  • 35% browsing the web
  • 22% social media
  • 12% play games
  • 12% watch videos

leaving 19% for EVERYTHING ELSE. Let’s be generous and suppose that email takes up only half of that (it’s probably more). That leaves 10% for ALL other activities, including, BUT NOT LIMITED TO actually making something. What do you use your computer for? I don’t know about you but I write papers and books, develop games, write actual computer programs, create presentations, design courses, do accounting, archive several hundred gigabytes of photos, videos and other info, and so on. The iPad can handle NONE of that.

 

This ad claims the “new” iPad 3 will replace nearly $3500 worth of devices. OK, I’ll bite. Lets see…

$710 Laptop: NOPE. One of the last trips I was on, I took my iPad and my Transformer. Sorry to say NEITHER one could even help me make a simple powerpoint presentation. I was able to edit one on the Transformer, but I couldn’t make a new one. When I travel, I still need my netbook. Whatever my netbook can’t handle, I do at home on my desktop.

$105 e-reader: maybe. Although, that’s debatable. I much prefer my Kobo for reading: it’s light, batteries last for days, and I can read in the daylight. If anyone thinks I’m going to replace my Kobo with something that costs more than twice as much, think again.

$200 tablet: the iPad IS a tablet, for crying out loud.  Most people have no use for TWO tablets, so this is just a red herring.

$120 Gaming System: Yea, … NO WAY. Anyone who is in the least serious about playing games will NOT be replacing their Wii, or Xbox, or PlayStation, or ANY of their portable game devices with an iPad. Most gamers – even most fairly casual gamers have multiple game devices. They’re not like toasters you know, where all you need is one.

$1500 digital SLR camera : SERIOUSLY? ….. This is a joke, right? The iPad takes LOUSY pictures. Anyone who is interested enough in photography to buy a digital SLR would think you were NUTS if you suggested the iPad toy camera could replace their real camera.

$370 point-and-shoot camera: HARDLY. By modern standards, 5MP is pathetic, and the iPad doesn’t even have a flash. Like I said, the iPad takes lousy pictures. My Transformer is better. Hell, my phone (NOT an iPhone) is better. AND, my little point-and-shoot takes 12 MP pics, does great video, has 3x optical and 12x digital zoom, and has a GOOD flash. NOT only that, it’s shock-proof, freeze-proof AND water-proof. I wonder what would happen to my iPad if I accidentally dropped it in duck poo on a winter day and then tried to wash it under the tap? I’ve done that with my point-and-shoot. It’s FINE. I doubt the iPad would be. (And I can totally see myself walking around on the farm toting an iPad around my neck while I do chores so I’ll be ready to snap that perfect picture. NOT. I’d look like something out of The Typing of the Dead. And I have no doubt the bunnies and other critters would be perfectly fine with me shoving something that looks like a book in their faces….. Thanks. I’ll keep my point-and-shoot. I’ll buy another camera before I buy another iPad).

$435 iPad 2 OK. This is just specious. I can’t think of ANY reason to replace a functioning tablet with another ALMOST identical tablet. The iPad 3, in spite of claims to the contrary is not a revolutionary ANYTHING, unless you count brainwash.

On second thought…. if you buy the ‘message’ in this ad, I have some snake oil you might also be interested in…… cheap…. replaces ALL OTHER DRUGS. Seriously. No. Really…..

3 people like this post.

Cool – Texting of the Bread

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

TextingoftheBread.com.

How come no-one told me they’d re-skinned this again?!
I *still* think Typing of the Deadwas one of the best typing tutors ever made, but this one might actually less push-back from teachers (assuming of course, teachers even acknowledge the value of learning how to text).

Be the first to like.

“Working with researchers who are legendary game designers in their own mind” | Pamela M. Kato, EdM, PhD

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

 

Working with researchers who are legendary game designers in their own mind” | Pamela M. Kato, EdM, PhD.

A nice piece.

Researcher also = client here.

1 person likes this post.