Critters I’ve Seen

Approximate Reading Time: 3 minutes

Fox

I try not to take anything for granted, but I see coyotes almost every day – there are at least 3 distinct groups that live around our place. We try our best to co-exist. In the 20 years we’ve been out here we’ve only ever shot one – she was very young and refused to keep her distance even when we were around.

Last year we had one raise a litter right by the road at the corner of our property. We often hear pups trying out their voices this time of year but last year was the first time I ever got to watch pups play.

One time we witnessed a coyote being driven out of a pack. It took most of the afternoon – he (I assume it was a male) kept trying to return to the group. For weeks afterwards we could hear him calling – his call was quite different from the usual singing and we often saw him at the edge of the bush.

coyoteThere are a few we recognize by sight – Bob, who has a problem with one of his front legs; The Rattail – he has no hair on his tail at all, and there’s a new one hanging around lately that worries me – he is unusually large – I suspect he may be a coy-dog (coyote/dog cross, which can be dangerous).

Both the coyotes and ‘our’ fox will come right up to the house (though the fox avoids the coyotes as they will kill him if they get the chance) – the fox will come in broad daylight whereas the coyotes usually only come that close at night. I can tell which is in the yard before I even look by the way Arrow barks.

With our view we get to see a lot of things. A few days ago I saw a deer walking very slowly across our hay field. She kept looking behind her and finally I noticed she had a fawn with her – barely taller than the grass. The doe would take a few steps and then wait while her little one caught up. Every now and then the baby would burst into a run and then mom could move faster because she could keep her eye on it. It is only the 3rd time I’ve seen such a young fawn. I came across one in the woods once when I was working at Butterfield Acres. It was about the size of a cat, lying in a tight ball and the only sign it was alive was that its nose would twitch now and then. I went back to see it about 4 times over the course of the day – I don’t think it moved once.

We’ve seen swans, badgers, porcupines, skunk, weasels (several species), muskrats, herds of over 100 deer; even saw elk just up the road once (this is not their normal range), but the animal that never fails to put a smile on my face is the moose. They live around here but we don’t see them very often. There is a cow with new twin calves around now. I don’t know how much territory they require or if they share space but I saw another cow moose (could have been the same one) a month or so ago wandering across the neighbour’s field with 2 yearling calves in tow. The calves were acting like two children – one would try to walk right behind mom, and the other would chase it away and then get behind mom himself whereupon the other would then try and get his ‘spot’ back. I could imagine them complaining to their mom (“Mom!!! He’s TOUCHING me! Make him stop! I was here first!”). Mom would look back at them every once in a while and then just drop her head a bit and keep walking. She did not look amused.

I can’t imagine how anyone can be unmoved (or uninterested). I’m also convinced that the typical urban tendency to insulate oneself from nature poses a greater danger to ourselves and the planet than we realize.

Be the first to like.

Small Ideas: The problem with collaborative brainstorming tools.

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute
edistorm

Edistorm.

Here is a tool that facilitates collective brainstorming using e-sticky notes. I love sorting and organizing and this tool seems to be set up quite nicely. I also love things that are colourful. I really wanted to find this useful.

BUT, it suffers from the same limitation that every other tool I’ve looked at has: the writing part is LINEAR. The notes are placed in nice neat rows. Ideas aren’t like that.

The sticky notes here (like all other sticky notes I’ve seen) use the keyboard.

The first thing that occurred to me when I looked at this tool was that I would use it IFF I could write notes using my Wacom pen tablet.

I still have and use paper sticky notes. I find them very useful. Know why? Because they do not require me to put my thoughts down in a linear fashion. I write notes at an angle. Different angles grab my attention in different ways. I also circle things and draw arrows. These are crucial elements.

I’ll wait.

Be the first to like.

Why Education Research Is Failing Us: Begley – Sharon Begley – Newsweek.com

Approximate Reading Time: 3 minutes

Why Education Research Is Failing Us: Begley – Sharon Begley – Newsweek.com.

Synopsis:

This article reports on a meta study comparing inquiry methods against a more trditional approach. What was found is that:

“There is a dearth of carefully crafted, quantitative studies on what works,” says William Cobern of Western Michigan University. “It’s a crazy situation.”

I tend to agree with the conclusions, but I am concerned that we are not going to make any progress by simply re-doubling our efforts. I posted this on my Fabebook page, and this is part of the conversation that resulted. I found it interesting. Maybe you will too.

Michael Barbour suggested that:

This article is a crock – as it continues the myth of the double-blind, quasi-experimental model as the gold standard. Unfortunately educational research has often been driven by what will be funded or, in the case of unfunded research, what is easy to accomplish. In both instances this has resulted in poor research – and as long as the method of medical research is used as the measure of what we consider good or what we consider as working (as evidenced by the “What Works Clearinghouse” – another laughable initiative), educational research will get no better.

What folks won’t tell you is that the double-blind quasi-experiment model isn’t blind. Real medications have side effects, sugar pills don’t. Real medications often have scents or textures that placebos don’t, to the point that in most instances those administering the treatments know whether a patient is getting the medication or the placebo.

Let’s also not forget that most medications work with the body and in randomized instances, most differences in bodies will be a wash. This is not the case with educational research, as while a randomly selected group of students has the same chance of having a higher percentage of free or reduced lunch students in both the treatment and the control groups, it doesn’t guarantee it. But any noticeable difference in the percentage of this population in your two groups should yield widely differing results, regardless of the instructional intervention.

This is why many folks have begun to argue that design-based research (also called developmental research) is the direction we should be heading. The problem is that no one will fund a study that is designed to address local situations, and not designed to be generalizable.

My thoughts:

There really is no “science” in educational research, nor should there be. To do scientific studies we need to be able to actually control the variables – and we can’t in education. There are just too many of them. Also, to do stats we need numbers – volume. There are few studies where N is large enough to warrant statistical analysis, but they do them anyways and the results get used as though they have some validity.

Academia and formal education have subscribed to the notion that anything “scientific” is better than anything that isn’t, so we bend and stretch the notion of the scientific process to the point that it becomes meaningless. Adding the word “Science” to something doesn’t make it so. Very few things are actually sciences. Social Science is NOT a science. Nor is computer science (or math), for that matter.

So long as we keep pretending that we are doing ‘science’ in Ed Research, we will not make any real progress.

To which Michael replied:

But is the double-blind, quasi-experimental model really even as good as everyone claims it to be? I specific try to avoid saying the science model, as I see no problem with the science model (i.e., funded research into undirected avenues, hoping that something might lead to a breakthrough about something else). What is being valued here is the medical model (i.e., double-blind, quasi-experimental) and that model is fundamentally flawed.
My thoughts on that:

No model is perfect but it is a reasonable model for certain kinds of studies, including medical ones. The problem with this kind of study lies with the people administering it. Drug tests are run by big drug companies with a vested interest in a particular outcome.

Educational research shares many of the same problems as media effects research has – assumptions are made about what factors influence the outcome and how they are related long before the study even begins. This allows the researchers to ignore things they don’t find interesting and to find the results they want.

Most of the researchers have no formal training as scientists.  Having come to formal education as my terminal degree (my first two are in CS) I have noticed that there is often a

People formally trained in education realize that learning to teach takes work while many academics outside of Education have little respect for the discipline. Similarly, people formally trained in science realize that learning to do science takes work and many academics outside of Science believe they can do science on anything. Many educational researchers fall into this category.

This is Cargo Cult Science and a lot of people do it, including lots of scientists. Doesn’t make right, or useful. (here is an excerpt from Feynman’s speech: http://tinyurl.com/3yh92pn)

If we’re going to do science, then let’s do REAL science. (I’m not sure that’s possible in social contexts, but I’m willing to be found wrong).

Be the first to like.

lols: Rott-on-a-Rope

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

*Only Available in Black.

Be the first to like.

Here’s The Privacy Line That Facebook Just Crossed…

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

Here’s The Privacy Line That Facebook Just Crossed…. by Jeff Jarvis | May. 9, 2010, 9:06 AM

While I agree with Jeff Jarvis that FB has crossed a line by putting the stuff I offer to share with my FBFriends into the public space, I think the problem is more sinister than that. The BIG problem for me is that we are being sold for FB’s profit with no ability to opt out. I always assumed that everything I do on FB is public. This is different.

Here’s the difference:

On my own blog, my words and pictures are MINE and people who want to use them need to ask my permission or at least give me attribution. I know not everyone does, but we do have laws in place and legal remedies when people don’t play by the rules.

On Facebook, THEY have taken ownership (and copies) of my words, pictures, comments, likes, etc. and now SELL them to anyone who wants them. They have recorded every keystroke I EVER made from the time I first got an account. Even the ones I deleted.

My pictures can be used in some ad and I will never be asked or told.

I NEVER agreed to this. It’s sleazy.

Be the first to like.

lols – What Duck?

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

Be the first to like.

The Evolution of Privacy on Facebook

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

The Evolution of Privacy on Facebook.  by Matt McKeon

I have always assumed that my any information I put anywhere but my own domain is totally public. (You should too).

But what Facebook is doing is really very sleazy. For instance:

  1. They keep copies of all your pictures. ALL of them. If you take your down, they still keep theirs. And they reserve the right to use them.
  2. They use your profile picture and information in other public places as a marketing tool: “So-and-so liked this too…..”
  3. They sell their your information and make a profit off of you. (It’s not really yours once they “take” it.)
  4. They have a copy of EVERYTHING you ever did on Facebook. Your posts; your likes; your friends; your PAST friends. EVERYTHING. Not sure on this, but I’m willing to bet they have applied their new (UN)privacy policies retroactively.

I think it’s high time we let them know we UNLIKE this!!!

From THIS:

To THIS:

Be the first to like.

lol – Tonight on C.S.I.

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

Be the first to like.