Game-Based Learning vs Game Pedagogy

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

Putting everything that has to with learning and games under one name obscures the complexity of the field. We should use TWO terms: Game-Based Learning for the learner’s perspective, and Game Pedagogy for the teacher’s perspective.

bookblog:game-based_learning_vs_game_pedagogy [Magic Bullet Games].

1 person likes this post.

Instructional Theories for DGBL

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

Another sneak peek to my book. This one outlines instructional theories relevant to GBL.

bookblog:dgbl_instructional_theories [Magic Bullet Games].

Be the first to like.

Learning Theories for DGBL

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

classification_of_learning_principles_5Another sneak peek to my book. This one outlines learning theories relevant to GBL.

 

 

2 people like this post.

Practical Gamification | HCT Dubai Mobile Learning

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

My free mini-course starts tomorrow. Practical Gamification | HCT Dubai Mobile Learning. April 5-9, 2015

Be the first to like.

book-teasers [Magic Bullet Games]

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

Progress on my book is proceeding, albeit slowly. The first few chapters are the hardest for me, as they involve a whole lot of background research to make sure the information is up to date. Interestingly, it is actually more work than my original literature review for my PhD.

I have begun to post a few sneak previews. Check them out:

book-teasers [Magic Bullet Games].

 Stay tuned for more as it develops. 🙂

1 person likes this post.

6 Great Interview Questions You Should Ask

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

These are really good. Any company that balks at answering these questions seems like one to stay away from.

LearnVest- 6 Interview Questions You Should Ask.

  1. What’s the difference between a good employee in this role and a fantastic one?
  2. What’s the process for on-boarding employees, and how do you handle beginner mistakes?
  3. What are some ways the company focuses on team development?
  4. What do you love about working here – and what do you dislike?
  5. What would your employees say are the top three reasons they love working for you?
  6. How does this position support the company’s mission and goals and projected success?
6 people like this post.

Waiting for Heroes so we can clap.

Approximate Reading Time: 3 minutes

Most people aren’t bad, merely weak. They will fall in behind anyone who is loud and claims to be righteous – even if they’re not.*

We love to believe that the world is changed by heroes, and, since we aren’t heroes, it’s OK for us to sit around and wait for one to come along, so we can cheer him/her on.
Truth is, that’s not how it works.

Rosa Parks’ OTHER arrest—Feb. 22, 1956 – David LaMotteDavid LaMotte.

And what narrative do we prefer? I call it the Hero Narrative, and it basically comes down to this: Things change on a large scale when someone extraordinary does something dramatic in a moment of crisis. That’s how to address a problem, or so the story goes.

If you don’t agree that this is the dominant narrative of change in our culture, I suggest that you drive to the nearest multiplex theater and see how many of the movies on the marquee have that plot. And not just Jupiter Ascending and American Sniper, but Frozen and Harry Potter, too. The Hero narrative is so pervasive and ubiquitous that it is hard to even see that it is there.

You can find it in history books, too, and that’s where the narrative gets really troubling. We love it so much that we have a tendency (usually unconscious, I believe) to tell even our history in such a way that it fits this story pattern as well.

There is another narrative that is not nearly as popular, but has the added benefit of actually being true. The Movement Narrative says that things change on a large scale when a lot of people move a little bit in the same direction. When we really study Rosa Parks’ story, we find that it fits the Movement Narrative much better than the Hero Narrative.*

I MUCH prefer the Rosa Parks story that shows that she was strong, independent, and willing to stand up for her principles every day. THAT is the example we need to try and follow.

There are several problems with the Hero Narrative. The first is that it teaches us that to solve a problem, you need a hero. Most of us don’t see ourselves as heroes, and don’t know too many people with capes and exo-undies, so it’s a logical conclusion that we are not the ones to make a change.

So we wait for someone to come along and fix the problems, at which point we will do our part: clap.

And even if we can find a hero, what is the next step for addressing a problem in this version of how change happens? We need a crisis.

So again, we wait. And if we find a hero and happen to encounter a crisis, then what is step three?

* I learned the hard way that 95% of the people who claimed to be my friends weren’t really. This is probably always true. They will fall in line with whatever “leader” happens to offer them the best deal. They believe words over actions because it’s easier than thinking for oneself.

At the university where I used to have tenure there were many people who claimed to be my friend, yet when I was being attacked by my head & dean, they simply stood by and did nothing. A few were apologetic about it, a few sided with admin, but most just told themselves that they had nothing to do with it so it was OK to go with the flow.

In the faculty where I got my PhD, everything was fine…. until I had an opinion that differed from the one I was supposed to have (i.e. the one held by those “above” me).

I’m told the best revenge is living well. I don’t believe that revenge ever solves anything, but it *is* nice when you discover that your happiness and success don’t require the approval or help of those who only support you so long as you are making them look better than they are.

1 person likes this post.

What if Finland’s great teachers taught in U.S. schools? – The Washington Post

Approximate Reading Time: 2 minutes

What if Finland’s great teachers taught in U.S. schools?

They’d likely quit in disgust.

The US education crisis is not going to be solved by bringing in great teachers.

  • A great many American systems are based on competition and measuring things that are easy to measure.
  • The American love affair with capitalism pretty much precludes any genuine standardization
    • private interests are profit-driven and do not – by definition – care about serving the needs of the population or the citizens (only customers and share-holders).
    • success is measured in dollars, which has little to do with what makes the Finnish system successful
    • teacher prep programs in Finland accept only the best and the brightest, not those most able to pay
    • teaching in Finland is a respected profession, not the consolation prize
  • The tremendous gap between the haves and the have-nots in the US makes the Finnish system impossible
    • the rich will expect to be treated better than the poor
    • the rich will expect to  be able to buy their way into whatever they want
    • the rich do not want to share their riches
  • The US preoccupation with competition and being able to think of themselves as the “best” also makes the Finnish system all but impossible.

I think it is incredibly telling that the Finnish system came about because they were trying to provide a solid education to ALL (regardless of economic status), and NOT because they were trying to beat anyone at anything.

In the United States, for example, there are more than 1,500 different teacher-preparation programs. The range in quality is wide. In Singapore and Finland only one academically rigorous teacher education program is available for those who desire to become teachers.

Teacher quality in high-performing countries is a result of careful quality control at entry into teaching rather than measuring teacher effectiveness in service.

Some commonly held American fallacies

  • “the quality of an education system cannot exceed the quality of its teachers.”
    False. People tend to live up (or down) to expectations.
  • “the most important single factor in improving quality of education is teachers.”
    False. There are a number of influences, but poverty is a biggie.
  • “If any children had three or four great teachers in a row, they would soar academically, regardless of their racial or economic background, while those who have a sequence of weak teachers will fall further and further behind”.
    OK. This one is just goofy. Do people really think this?

I think one of the big barriers to improving the education system in the US is the almost fanatical belief that they are already the best there is at everything.  Rather than take a good hard look at how their systems may have contributed to the problem, they seem to think that all they have to do is create more competition (through more testing and grading of teachers).

1 person likes this post.