Nerds and Male Privilege

Approximate Reading Time: 2 minutes

Hear, hear:

 

Nerds and Male Privilege.

Y’see, one of the issues that nerd girls face is the fact that they are seen as girls first and anything else second. And before you flood my comments section demanding to know why this is a bad thing, realize that being seen as a “girl” first colors every interaction that they have within fandom. They’re treated differently because they are women.

Male privilege – again – is about what men can expect as the default setting for society. A man isn’t going to have everything about him filtered through the prism of his gender first. A man, for example, who gets a job isn’t going to face with suggestions that his attractiveness or that his willingness to perform sexual favors was a factor in his being hired, nor will he be shrugged off as a “quota hire”. A man isn’t expected to be a representative of his sex in all things; if he fails at a job, it’s not going to be extrapolated that all men are unfit for that job. A man who’s strong-willed or aggressive won’t be denigrated for it, nor are men socialized to “go along to get along”. A man can expect to have his opinion considered, not dismissed out of hand because of his sex. When paired with a woman who’s of equal status, the man can expect that most of the world will assume that he’s the one in charge. And, critically, a man doesn’t have to continually view the world through the lens of potential violence and sexual assault.

Now with this in mind, consider why being a girl first may be a hindrance to geek girls. A guy who plays a first person shooter – Call of Duty, Halo, Battlefield, what-have-you – online may expect a certain amount of trash talking, but he’s not going to be inundated with offers for sex, threats of rape, sounds of simulated masturbation or demands that he blow the other players – but not before going to the kitchen and getting them a beer/sandwich/pizza first. Men will also not be told that they’re being “too sensitive” or that “they need to toughen up” when they complain about said sexual threats.

Men also won’t have their opinions weighed or dismissed solely on the basis of how sexy or attractive they are. The most common responses a woman can expect in an argument – especially online – is that she’s fat, ugly, single, jealous, a whore, or a lesbian – or any combination thereof – and therefore her opinion is irrelevant, regardless of it’s actual merits. This is especially true if she’s commenting on the portrayal of female characters, whether in comics, video games or movies.

Very well said.

1 person likes this post.

Why I Hate My iPad

Approximate Reading Time: 2 minutes

I bought an iPad in September.

I was not really excited. There is no question that Apple products are sleek and good-looking.  Beautiful even.

For some of us though, functionality is a bigger part of the user experience than how it looks, or how good I look when I’m using it in a public space. I’ve been in computer science for nearly 35 years. I feel no need to impress people with my tech savvy.

I bought this iPad because I do work in education and new media and I need to be able to see what people are making, doing, and talking about. Many apps for the ipad are available ONLY on the ipad. So I bought one.

It has a nice screen. The touch interface works well – most of the time (though it is certainly not as responsive or reliable as iPad junkies would have you believe).

There are some fun games available.

It’s pretty good – most of the time – for reading mail. It’s very slow and often requires you to re-start the app in order to move things along.

It’s mediocre at surfing the web – again: it’s slow, frequently hangs, and of course, there’s the whole “can’t do anything that requires flash of Java” thing (see later, under why I hate my iPad).

The sound is OK.

It’s fairly light; easy to carry around and the batteries last a pretty long time.

 

That’s about where my accolades end.

The list of reasons I hate my iPad is long and grows almost daily.

Why I Hate my iPad

Here are the first ten that pop into my head:

  1. You can’t initialize your iPad unless you have a computer.
  2. AND an iTunes account.
  3. My ability to personalize the device (it is MINE, right?) is extremely limited.
  4. Many of the apps can’t be personalized (what if don’t LIKE brown for my calendar)?
  5. It does not support flash.
  6. It does not support Java.
  7. It has no USB ports.
  8. Memory is limited.
  9. It can only do one thing at a time.
  10. There is no BACK button.
  11. There is only one way to do most things.
  12. You can’t put anything on it, except through iTunes.
  13. You can’t take anything off, except through iTunes.
  14. There are many things you can’t readily save elsewhere AT ALL.

Oh, yeah, and the camera SUCKS. (My DS takes better pictures.)

It also doesn’t record image information in the same way as other devices, like, my DS, my phone, and EVERY digital camera I have ever owned.

There are many more but these are the ones that popped into my head in the first 30 seconds. I’ll add more as they occur to me…..

Stay tuned.

17 people like this post.

Donald Clark Plan B: 21st Century Skills are so last century!

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

Donald Clark Plan B: 21st Century Skills are so last century!.

Hmmmm…

Wonder if formal Education (and the associated formal Educators) will be able to see the irony that’s being highlighted here?

I also like Steven Downes’ list:

My list is very different:
– emergent thinking: extracting patterns, rules, regularities, prototypes
– sensing value – finding meaning, truth, relevance, purpose, goals
– acting semiotically – using signs, signals, art, desig, etc., to do things
– seeing beyond – describing, defining, drawing conclusions, explaining data
– ecological sensitivity – placing in context, seeing frames, making meaning
– living in change – understanding flow, adaptation, progression
These are literacies that reflect the times and not simply the fact that we have a lot of machines.

I agree with Steven that the list really is grounded in 20-century perspectives, but I also suspect that this is the only way formal Education will be able to comprehend it. Like I’ve said before, formal education is profoundly broken. I really don’t see a century old system changing very fast, or very much, except around the edges.

Unfortunately for them, if they don’t change, many institutions will find themselves becoming extinct as ‘free’ people find more and more other ways to learn and as these people realize that formal schooling isn’t providing anything they need. Perhaps, formal schooling has had it’s time. Perhaps it’s time to look at getting rid of it entirely?

Be the first to like.

Techno-toddlers: A is for Apple | Technology | The Guardian

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

Techno-toddlers: A is for Apple | Technology | The Guardian.

Earlier this year, AVG Technologies, a firm that makes antivirus computer software, conducted a survey of mothers of children aged between two and five with internet access at home. They found that more of the children knew how to play a computer game than swim or ride a bike, and that more pre-schoolers knew how to use a smartphone than tie their shoelaces.

Interesting…..

Once we develop the hoverchair, those kids will be all set…  (http://pixar.wikia.com/Axiom)

Srsly, I don’t see anything wrong with little tykes knowing how to use the technology that surrounds them, so long as there is balance. In other words they should also know: how to play in the dirt, climb trees, build forts, and be a duck. They should know what a worm feels like in your hand, how to make a snow-angel, what happens when you kick a dandelion in seed, how to make a snapdragon talk, and much, much more.

 

To these kids, the tablet is NOT “technology”, it is merely part of their world. The challenge for us is to make sure that those things we cherish and deem important are ALSO part of their world.

 

Be the first to like.

Cats and Rabbits (and getting people to do what you want)

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

Rabbits are prey animals.

They are easily frightened – and for good reason. They are yummy and there are few meat-eaters who would refuse an opportunity to eat rabbit. (NOTE: this is not an animal welfare post – I’m building a metaphor – so bear with me)
The way to make a frightened rabbit settle when holding it is to hold it tighter.
They feel secure cradled in your arms with their heads tucked tightly under your arm.

Cats, on the other hand, are predators.

They may be cautious, but they are much less easily frightened. They are among the group of critters that like to eat rabbits (I’m told it is almost the only thing a lynx will eat).
The best way to hold a cat is to apply as little pressure as possible – often, the tighter you hold them, the more they will struggle to get free.

People are much more like cats than rabbits.

The more freedom you can give them to move as they see fit, the more likely you are to get what you want from them.

Some of that is about trust.

Perhaps some of it is also because we too are predators.

1 person likes this post.

Slouching toward a bananapocalypse? | Grist

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

Slouching toward a bananapocalypse? | Grist.

All commercial bananas are of the same variety. They’re also seedless – which means they are not only the same kind but they are also the same plant. If something infects one instance of that plant, it can infect ALL OF THEM. 100% infection because they all share the same genetics; the same resistance; the same susceptibilities.

This is why we need to preserve as many different breeds as we can. I’ve talked about this before here and here.

 

Be the first to like.

No More Swikis: End of the Constructionist Web at Georgia Tech « Computing Education Blog

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

No More Swikis: End of the Constructionist Web at Georgia Tech « Computing Education Blog.

I’m seeing similar edicts coming from other universities too. I moved all of my university-related stuff to my own private domain several years before I actually left the university because I found it increasingly difficult to do collaborative and cooperative work with and for my students using the university web-spaces. I even set up my own Moodle site on my domain so I could deal with grades and content that could not be publicly posted.

If the formal institutions do not realize that they need to become more open rather than more protectionist, they will become the agents of their own downfall.

Be the first to like.

What if the Secret to Success Is Failure? – NYTimes.com

Approximate Reading Time: < 1 minute

What if the Secret to Success Is Failure? – NYTimes.com.

I’ve been saying this for years!!!

Be the first to like.